Okay, so I am Swedish. I am a woman privileged enough to live and work in a country that has bent over backwards since the 1960’s to make it possible for women to combine children and professional ambitions, ergo good, state-funded childcare. long parental leaves and a legislation that in general is supportive to parents.
Most Swedish people consider the gender issue over and done with. Women are considered just as competent as men – if not more – and 45% of the seats in our parliament are held by women. Of course, scrape a bit on the surface, and traditional gender patterns become visible. Women take more months of parental leave than men do. Women still have a tendency to work part-time while their children are young (which in practise means delivering the same amount of work at lower pay). Women still do more of the traditional housework. Women still live in a constant state of guilt – not enough time to invest at work because they have to rush off and pick up their kids, not enough time spent on their kids because they have to prepare for tomorrow’s meeting. Besides, we all know that good mothers cook and bake, produce fantastic masquerade costumes at the snap of their fingers (seriously; Emma Thompson in Love Actually and the lobster suit. Angst, pure angst) keep track of shots and illnesses, of dental appointments, of homework to be done, of whatever other scheduled activities their children might have. Phew.
So yes, there is a lot that has to be done. In my book, equal rights and equal opportunities for everyone, no matter gender, age, race, sexual orientation, is a given. I am, however, somewhat tired by the fact that sometimes people confuse the word “equal” with “same”. I want pay equal to that of any male colleague for equal job, but I definitely don’t want to be my male colleague, nor dress like him, nor have him copying my behavioural patterns. I am me, he is he, and a fundamental part of who we are is our gender. So at times I rush into work in a bright red dress, a flowery shawl and boots, while he rarely – if ever – would sport something less conservative than a shirt and suit. Now, should he want to wear a red dress, I would of course support him – as long as he was doing it because he wanted to rather than because he was attempting to conform to some fluffy sort of feminist ideal.
Traditional patriarchal cultures can be oppressive towards women – correction; most of them are. It is to everyone’s benefit to work against those cultural aspects that infringe on an individual’s rights to become the person they want to be/dream of being. But it is also important to understand that the dreams will not be the same, and a woman who dreams of being a housewife and mother is not necessarily repressed – nor is her dream of less value because it doesn’t include “being the Secretary General of the United Nations.”
Ultimately, things will change. Women are as strong, as capable, as independent as any man. Already today, young women dominate in universities. Twenty, thirty years from now it will be women who dominate in politics, in business. Women will be the high-flyers, the ones who bring home the fattest pay-checks. Will it make us women happier? Not so sure. Nor is it necessarily a given that a society dominated by women will be a fairer, better place than the society we live in today – after all, it would presumptuous to assume some sort of moral superiority comes natural to women.
I shared these thought with some older gentlemen some days ago. These are tough men, who’ve worked their way up through the hard world of business to end up more or less at the top. They are well beyond retirement age but are still among the movers and shakers – and they are all warm advocates of hiring women, as they perceive them to be far more competent than their male counterparts. Plus, one of them said with a laugh, why not exploit this feeling of inferiority that has women working so hard just to prove they can do as well or better than a man? So what will men do in this futuristic, female dominated society, I asked them. Once again they laughed.
“Now this is where us men really are smarter than you women,” the oldest of them said, tapping his nose. “You will slog your days away, out to prove yourselves, and we’ll be sitting in the bars, enjoying our pints while we congratulate ourselves on our excellent choice in bread-winning women.” Huh; for some reason, I felt cheated…
I have no idea what your dreams might be – just as you don’t know mine. And I don’t believe it is our gender that defines our dreams, it is the people we are. What is truly important is that our genders don’t restrict our dreams – a girl may aspire to be an astronaut just as much as a boy, a boy may want to be a nurse or a pre-school teacher just as much as a girl. So, one dream of mine is to allow people to dream as they please – and, if possible, help them achieve them. You want to climb Mount Everest? Buy yourself some mountain gear and start practising. You want to become a CEO? Roll up your sleeves and start slogging, honey, because that’s a long, tough haul. You want to be a home-maker and take care of your kids? Go ahead. You want to do ALL three? Go for it! Personally, I think I’ll stay right here, in front of the fire with a teacup at hand. But I’ll be cheering you on – all the way – no matter what gender you are!
13 thoughts on “The inevitable journey towards female supremacy”
Anna, your articles are always so thoughtful and interesting!
Thank you Helen!
Well said, Anna – and I totally agree.
What your article leaves out is the elephant in the room. And it is so easy to see for any man or boy. And it is this…..there is no longer any need for a male of any age to care. Men, and especially young men simply don’t care any longer. The rise of women has relieved them of any ANY responsibility in life. They need only take care of themselves with no remorse for not raising a family. They are unwanted in government, unwanted in large corporations (unless of course they are men of color) and in general unwanted in society. For the most part, many are fine with this. I think we are much happier without the burden. You go girl.
I actually think you missed out on part of the message: EQUAL rights, no more, no less. As the mother of three fantastic boys I am more than proud to let you know they definitely DO care – and will make fantastic fathers, as their father is. Yes, there is a risk women will be left holding the can all on their own. Seeing as the world is as full of ambitious young men as it is of ambitious young women I don’t think that will happen.
Speaking as a 30 year old male, I and most of my generation are no longer interested in marrying, living with a woman or having children. This movement is growing and we will be the majority of men in the next 10 years.
This leads to countries bringing over millions of immigrants to support the growing retired population. Also women who want children have to become single mothers or initially marry/live with a loser man and end up a single mother. Single mothers are very often miserable and stressed out.
The lesson here is that if you discriminate against men, we will destroy your society by simply staying single.
having sons who are a couple of years younger than you, i am happy to report this movement of yours does not seem to be universal. personally, i find it sad if men choose not to have children, for their sake. As i said,EQUAL is the key word here…
Men are not staying single to get back at women. They are staying single because many men do not see the value in being married anymore. One reason is that it just isn’t fair for men. Many women, no matter how modern and equally minded they are suddenly get very traditional when it comes to courtship/marriage/divorce. Men still foot the bill for most things (dating, rings, etc) Not that there aren’t exceptions to this, to be sure, but generally this is still how it is. Divorce is still very sexist. Women get primary resident for the child and men end up being a noncustodial parents. The fun part for women now is that they can make more than their husbands (because of equality), still be awarded custodial parent (because courts are still traditional) and receive a tax free check (child support) every month from him. Women have less incentive to stay married when they are financially independent and this, combined with being the custodial parent, tax breaks (head of household) and other perks they will file for divorce more often. This puts men at a huge disadvantage. You were right , Anna, the key word there is EQUAL. However, I am not sure that women know or realize what that entails.
In Sweden we’ve moved way beyond the “sexist” approach to divorce. The norm is that parents who divorce get shared custody, with the child living one week with one parent, the next with the other. But you’re right; most modern women have little incentive to remain married – at least if they’re unhappy in their relationship. I remain hopeful that most relationships – whether married or not – are built on love, trust and respect. Such cornerstones should ensure the dismantling of a relationship is done in such a way as to cause as little pain as possible to the involved.
And I would be the first to point out that EQUAL is not a subjective word: if we are to be equal partners and share all the cores of the household, such chores should of course include the car-washing, the repairs on the window – just as well as the laundry and the cooking.
Thank you for stopping by – and don’t give up on all women, okay? Many of us love men – a lot – and want nothing more than living in an equal, mutually fulfilling relationship.
You talk about “equality” but then go on to predict an inevitable “society dominated by women.” The title of the article itself includes “female supremacy.” That is not what equality entails. I like the idea of everyone being free to chase their dreams, but your message is the same hypocrisy that modern feminism betrays itself with over and over again. Feminists grandstand about how they want “equality” but just below the surface lurks the true intent which is to seize power for themselves because in their hearts, they likely believe that they, women are superior to men and should be the ones holding the reigns of power. It’s a shame that it has to be that way because the ideal of a society in which men and women stand side by side and share power equally is beautiful one.
It would help if you had read the post. Then maybe you would have spotted the irony in the title, as well as gathered that I do NOT believe a society “controlled” by women is something to aspire to. I embrace equality in the true sense of the word – and I also believe it is polite to read what someone has expressed before bashing them over the head like you did.I am glad we share the same ideals, though…
Firstly, I am a submissive man. And nothing would make me more happy than just to give over the a female dominant. But indeed a society where women rule will eventually turns as bad as sadly the male ruled society we know has gone.
I am a believer, not in female supremacy or male supremacy, but in a Creator who created man (woman and man) to be their mutual compliment. Equal because they are human beings, different because one is male and the other female.
btw, I like the reply of the older men when asked what they’d be doing in a society where females rule everything, :-).
I totally agree – which, I hope, comes through in the post 🙂